Jenkinson

[louder]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.

And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

[ForeverRed]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.

And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

He's played well tonight and has done very well for West Ham. You're in the minority with that opinion L.

You're turning a blind eye to Wenger's obvious failings. Wouldn't be the first time, Louder.

[louder]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.
And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

He's played well tonight and has done very well for West Ham. You're in the minority with that opinion L.
You're turning a blind eye to Wenger's obvious failings. Wouldn't be the first time, Louder.

This is where you go wrong, FR. Everything comes down to pro or anti Wenger. Personally I look at it from a footballing perspective and not a personal one. Do I think Jenkinson would have made a huge difference to our current points tally ? Probably not. Do I think it's better for Jenkinson to be where he is rather than being subjected to microscopic analysis/criticism, as would''ve been likely were he to have been the mainstay at RB for us ? Probably.

Wenger didn't think Jenkinson was ready to play for Arsenal so maybe rather than protest against 90% of the decisions he makes, why not put your vendetta to one side and accept his decision. Btw, I have been saying all season that we are short of numbers at the back (Short of one player to be precise, imo) but you don't fill your side with what you feel is sub-standard players to counter this issue as you end up where the scum have for the past twenty + years. Bellerin looks a good player though !

[Rainham Red]

They love Jenkinson at West Ham and he is first choice but if he returns to us next season he will be behind Debuchy and maybe Bellerin not to mention Chambers.I know Jenks is an ardent Arsenal fan but I wonder if he might prefer to stay at West Ham.

[louder]

They love Jenkinson at West Ham and he is first choice but if he returns to us next season he will be behind Debuchy and maybe Bellerin not to mention Chambers.I know Jenks is an ardent Arsenal fan but I wonder if he might prefer to stay at West Ham.

Quite possibly, RR. I like to think that an Arsenal supporter can make it in our first team, but if he's not quite up to it then there are worse places to play than in another PL side. If Wenger hadn't've plucked him out of relative obscurity then Carl probably wouldn't be on such a successful career path.

[ForeverRed]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.
And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

He's played well tonight and has done very well for West Ham. You're in the minority with that opinion L.
You're turning a blind eye to Wenger's obvious failings. Wouldn't be the first time, Louder.

This is where you go wrong, FR. Everything comes down to pro or anti Wenger. Personally I look at it from a footballing perspective and not a personal one. Do I think Jenkinson would have made a huge difference to our current points tally ? Probably not. Do I think it's better for Jenkinson to be where he is rather than being subjected to microscopic analysis/criticism, as would''ve been likely were he to have been the mainstay at RB for us ? Probably.

Wenger didn't think Jenkinson was ready to play for Arsenal so maybe rather than protest against 90% of the decisions he makes, why not put your vendetta to one side and accept his decision. Btw, I have been saying all season that we are short of numbers at the back (Short of one player to be precise, imo) but you don't fill your side with what you feel is sub-standard players to counter this issue as you end up where the scum have for the past twenty + years. Bellerin looks a good player though !

I think Bellerin looks good but Jenkinson has to be in front of him in the pecking order surely? Bellerin looks like the one who needs a loan not Carl.

[Northern Gooner]

Having a good season but with the amazing season Bellerin is having is there room in our squad for him? Sadly I don't see it.

[I Believe Overall]

Keep Jenks and put him on loan for a couple of years if we can. Debuchy isn't getting any younger and Bellerin could go back to Spain.

[louder]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.
And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

He's played well tonight and has done very well for West Ham. You're in the minority with that opinion L.
You're turning a blind eye to Wenger's obvious failings. Wouldn't be the first time, Louder.

This is where you go wrong, FR. Everything comes down to pro or anti Wenger. Personally I look at it from a footballing perspective and not a personal one. Do I think Jenkinson would have made a huge difference to our current points tally ? Probably not. Do I think it's better for Jenkinson to be where he is rather than being subjected to microscopic analysis/criticism, as would''ve been likely were he to have been the mainstay at RB for us ? Probably.

Wenger didn't think Jenkinson was ready to play for Arsenal so maybe rather than protest against 90% of the decisions he makes, why not put your vendetta to one side and accept his decision. Btw, I have been saying all season that we are short of numbers at the back (Short of one player to be precise, imo) but you don't fill your side with what you feel is sub-standard players to counter this issue as you end up where the scum have for the past twenty + years. Bellerin looks a good player though !

I think Bellerin looks good but Jenkinson has to be in front of him in the pecking order surely? Bellerin looks like the one who needs a loan not Carl.

Just noticed this. Bellerin on loan ? Are you still so sure, FR ?

[louder]

Keep Jenks and put him on loan for a couple of years if we can. Debuchy isn't getting any younger and Bellerin could go back to Spain.

I watched CJ in the under 12 match against Germany the other week and I thought he looked quite good. Agree about Debuchy but you've thrown me with the 'Bellerin to Spain' comment.

[I Believe Overall]

Bellerin was in the Barca academy. Yes we've got a long term contract but if he was wanted by them and he wanted it we'd probably sell.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[louder]

Bellerin was in the Barca academy. Yes we've got a long term contract but if he was wanted by them and he wanted it we'd probably sell.

Oh ! They do have an ageing Alves too I suppose. He wouldn't be cheap though, and aren't they restricted on signing players ? Give us another two years and I'll think we'll be even more of an attractive proposition for top players than we already are, then hopefully Bellerin will see the future's bright, the future's Arsenal !

[German_Gooner]

I agree to louder, JK had a very good match against the German U20 last week,
but I would prefer young Bellerin, the combination of his speed and his technique is
something special and I think he is the most dangerous attacking RB in our team.
Debuchy is stronger in defending, but Hector is learning fast.

[Rainham Red]

When Debuchy is match fit I`m sure he will be our number 1 and although Jenkinson has done well at West Ham and as louder said it would be nice for an Arsenal fan to play for us I think Bellerin is the better player and should be No.2

[ForeverRed]

I think we can all agree (except 1 maybe) that this man should not have been loaned out. Playing very well for the Wammers whilst we're struggling for numbers. Crazy.

Wenger' s crazy.
And the lad is hardly standing out tonight. Maybe you're passing judgement on a player and a game that you're not even watching. Wouldn't be the first time, FR.

He's played well tonight and has done very well for West Ham. You're in the minority with that opinion L.
You're turning a blind eye to Wenger's obvious failings. Wouldn't be the first time, Louder.

This is where you go wrong, FR. Everything comes down to pro or anti Wenger. Personally I look at it from a footballing perspective and not a personal one. Do I think Jenkinson would have made a huge difference to our current points tally ? Probably not. Do I think it's better for Jenkinson to be where he is rather than being subjected to microscopic analysis/criticism, as would''ve been likely were he to have been the mainstay at RB for us ? Probably.

Wenger didn't think Jenkinson was ready to play for Arsenal so maybe rather than protest against 90% of the decisions he makes, why not put your vendetta to one side and accept his decision. Btw, I have been saying all season that we are short of numbers at the back (Short of one player to be precise, imo) but you don't fill your side with what you feel is sub-standard players to counter this issue as you end up where the scum have for the past twenty + years. Bellerin looks a good player though !

I think Bellerin looks good but Jenkinson has to be in front of him in the pecking order surely? Bellerin looks like the one who needs a loan not Carl.

Just noticed this. Bellerin on loan ? Are you still so sure, FR ?

Nope, i'm glad i've been proved wrong by him. Would you of said Bellerin in the first team back then? Hindsight is wonderful isn't it.

[louder]

Just noticed this. Bellerin on loan ? Are you still so sure, FR ?

Nope, i'm glad i've been proved wrong by him. Would you of said Bellerin in the first team back then? Hindsight is wonderful isn't it.

You seem to be posting this quite often recently I wouldn't have said he was first team quality back then, but neither would I have said he needed to be loaned out. If one posts such a certain opinion, which is all well and good, then one should be, and it appears you are, willing to have hindsight drawn upon. Much of what I post isn't subject to hindsight. I say what I see most of the time and leave the rest to Arsene !

[RedWithWhiteSleeves]

Just noticed this. Bellerin on loan ? Are you still so sure, FR ?

Nope, i'm glad i've been proved wrong by him. Would you of said Bellerin in the first team back then? Hindsight is wonderful isn't it.

You seem to be posting this quite often recently I wouldn't have said he was first team quality back then, but neither would I have said he needed to be loaned out. If one posts such a certain opinion, which is all well and good, then one should be, and it appears you are, willing to have hindsight drawn upon. Much of what I post isn't subject to hindsight. I say what I see most of the time and leave the rest to Arsene !

That's probably the most long winded way of saying "fair play mate" i've ever read